Research
Working Papers
Do Productivity Shocks Cause Inputs Misallocation?
Under Review
Firms exhibit varying productivity levels even within narrowly defined industries and face uncertainty when predicting future performance. This paper investigates
the link between productivity uncertainty, heterogeneity, and misallocation across
all inputs. Using a model where heterogeneous firms face staggered productivity
shocks, creating gaps between expected and actual productivity, I find a positive
association between marginal revenue product dispersions and productivity variability.
The analysis reveals that productivity shocks predominantly drive marginal
revenue product dispersions. By comparing baseline estimates with those from the
factor shares approach, I highlight the limitations of the latter method in analyzing
the effects of productivity evolution.
Conference Presentations:
2024: CAED (University Park, PA), EEA-ESEM (Rotterdam, NL), EARIE - Rising Star Session (Amsterdam, NL)
2023: 12th CompNet Annual Conference (Bruxelles, BE)
2022: MICROPROD - Final event (Bruxelles, BE)
In Search of (Factor-Biased) Learning by Exporting
Joint with Joonkyo Hong
Under Review
This study examines whether exporting enhances efficiency, with gains favoring specific production inputs. We propose a production function model within a dynamic exporting and investment framework, capturing factor-biased technical changes. Using Kalman filtering to isolate Hicks-neutral productivity from measurement error and applying propensity score matching to address endogeneity from self-selection into exporting, we analyze Colombia’s manufacturing sectors from 1981 to 1991. Results show that past exporting raises Hicks-neutral productivity by 8% and unskilled labor-augmenting efficiency by 4%, while reducing skilled labor-augmenting productivity by 3%. Additionally, new exporters achieve a 20% increase in Hicks-neutral and unskilled labor-augmenting productivity within four years.
Conference Presentations:
2024: SEA (Washington, DC)
2023: V International Scientific Conference of Economics and Management Researchers (Baku, AZ)
Joint with Joonkyo Hong
Under Review
In this study, we evaluate the reproducibility and replicability of Scott Orr’s (2022) innovative approach for identifying within-plant productivity differences across product lines. Orr’s methodology allows the estimation of plant-product level productivity, contingent upon a well-behaved pre-estimated demand system, which requires the use of carefully chosen instrumental variables (IVs) for output prices. Using Orr’s STATA replication package, we successfully replicate all primary estimates with the ASI Indian plant-level panel data from 2000 to 2007. Additionally, applying Orr’s replication codes to a sample from 2011 to 2020 reveals that the suggested IVs do not perform as expected.
Work in Progress
A Tale of Power and Progress: Productivity, Markups, and Markdowns in India's Automotive